Daily Archives: July 28, 2008

How Do Engaged vs. Disengaged Employees Feel About the Boss?

A significant difference between how disengaged employees feel about their bosses vs. engaged employees, across all industries, was discovered in a recent HR Solutions research study.

“Employee Engagement Survey” results revealed disengaged employees registered 56 percentage points lower than engaged employees on the following survey items:
 

  • My supervisor supports employee suggestions that are meant to correct existing problems. (Engaged employees, 88 percent favorable; disengaged employees, 32 percent favorable)
  • My supervisor makes people in our work group feel that they are a valued and important part of the team. (Engaged employees, 88 percent favorable; disengaged employees, 32 percent favorable)

 
The second most significant gap was found when employees were asked whether they find their supervisor friendly and helpful. Disengaged employees only scored 40 percent favorable compared to a high of 90 percent favorable for engaged employees.
 

If You Read Anything, Read This!:
Murat Philippe, principal consultant, with HR Solutions stated: “These scores underscore the importance of the immediate supervisor in engaging the workforce. A supervisor’s chances of having productive, engaged employees can hinge on whether the employees feel valued and empowered.”

For more info: http://www.hrsolutionsinc.com

Homeland Security Attacks Iowa SHRM

Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Stewart Baker said, "I suppose corporate hiring is easier if you can hire illegal workers."
Photo: John Shinkle

It’s one thing to have officials question a lobbying group’s motives behind closed doors. But, as the Society for Human Resource Management found out, it’s quite another to be slammed publicly on a government blog.

The author of the controversial July 11 post was Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Stewart Baker, who took issue with the group’s push to replace the E-Verify system, the on-line program that allows employers to check the legal immigration status of its hires.

SHRM lobbies for the HR execs who do corporate hiring. It also opposes E-Verify,” Baker wrote on the department’s blog. “I suppose corporate hiring is easier if you can hire illegal workers, so perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised that SHRM wants to kill a program that makes it harder to hire illegal workers.” The society of HR professionals hasn’t taken the jab lightly. On Friday, the group sent a letter to its 240,000 members, decrying the “uninformed and insulting” characterization. By Tuesday morning, about 4,500 members had contacted lawmakers to complain about Baker’s inaccurate and sarcastic conclusions, said the society’s lobbyist, Mike Aitken. To read the full article click here.

SHRM fight’s back – click here to read the SHRM President’s response to the blog post by Mr. Baker.

What are your thoughts or experience on this? Is E-Verify all it is cracked up to be or does SHRM have a real argument.

Full Disclosure: I am a member of SHRM’s Central Iowa Chapter and believe that they do have the best interest of business’s that they represent in mind with their concerns.